Sunday, September 2, 2012

Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?

Medicaid Eligibility Texas - Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism? The content is good quality and useful content, That is new is that you simply never knew before that I know is that I actually have discovered. Prior to the distinctive. It is now near to enter destination Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?. And the content associated with Medicaid Eligibility Texas.

Do you know about - Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?

Medicaid Eligibility Texas! Again, for I know. Ready to share new things that are useful. You and your friends.

Cro·ny·ism

What I said. It is not outcome that the actual about Medicaid Eligibility Texas. You look at this article for information about what you need to know is Medicaid Eligibility Texas.

How is Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?

We had a good read. For the benefit of yourself. Be sure to read to the end. I want you to get good knowledge from Medicaid Eligibility Texas.

[kroh-nee-iz-uhm]

-noun

the convention of favoring one's close friends, especially in politics and political appointments.

(Random House Dictionary)

Wisconsin Governor Scott Walker has received a lot of annotation for his funds mend Bill - and that's putting it lightly. Protesters have camped out and flooded the state capitol for weeks, and many stayed over the weekend even when threatened with arrest. Some Democrats and Labor movements have even made a comparison in the middle of the Republican Governor and previous leader of Egypt Hosni Mubarak. Suffice it to say, the situation is far from resolved.

Critics of Walker's bill have also contended that the legislation essentially amounts to old-school cronyism. Today, we take a look at this single aspect of the funds mend bill - what (if any) aspects of the bill show elements of cronyism, and is the bill (as a whole) cronyism?

As always, we urge you to take a first-hand look at the legislation and find out exactly what it means on your own. We'll be outside the basic elements of the bill, but it's foremost to have an informed populous - and remember, previous progressives fought hard just so documents such as these could be viewed in the collective forum!

The first issue we have with this legislation is that it's targeted on two levels: it punishes dissidents (those who voted against Walker for governor) and it rewards those who did keep him. The funds mend bill affects all collective union employees - except police, firefighters, and state troopers. Suspiciously, those three groups all gave keep in some way, shape or form to Walker's gubernatorial campaign. Equally as suspicious, those left affected by the part - most notably teachers (Weac) and state, county and local government workers (Afscme) - opposed Walker's run for the governor's seat, and instead supported Democrat Tom Barrett. Walker's response to the definite examine of why some unions were targeted for punishment and not others was that the government needs to be able to function in an emergency. However, that's a cop-out, and not even a good one. Corrections Officers (prison guards) also lose their benefits and collective bargaining proprietary under Walker's bill. It's audacious adequate for Walker to claim that teachers and state workers aren't foremost to Wisconsin in times of emergencies, but it's downright ludicrous for him to argue that prison guards wouldn't be foremost in the event of an emergency. We also don't understand how increased benefits and collective bargaining have anyone to do with how our police officers and firefighters would function in cases of emergencies. Are police going to say "We'll stop this riot if we get a raise," or will firefighters refuse to extinguish burning buildings if their benefits are cut? Walker's argument simply doesn't make sense. Seeing at this aspect of the funds mend Bill, Walker is spanking those who opposed him and rewarding those who didn't - cronyism at its best.

But the best argument for why Walker's bill is a cronyism tactic undoubtedly comes when you read the fine print. It's well and good that the bill has received national concentration for its "union-busting" measures, but that's not all it does. Three other aspects of the bill should be setting off alarm bells over Wisconsin so loud citizens of Texas should still be awake at night. First, the bill gives significantly more power to the division of health & Human Services to make sweeping changes to BadgerCare and other collective services for the poor. And by significantly more power, we mean it gives the heavily-conservative Dhhs head the power to "Override state Medicaid laws as [they] see fit and build sweeping changes along with reducing benefits and limiting eligibility," according to our friends at ThinkProgress.com. Second, the bill allows for the collective sale of state heating plants. Again, this sounds innocent enough, but Walker's motivations clearly aren't. You may have heard of the Koch brothers (or someone pretending to be a Koch brother) recently. The Koch's donated over ,000 to Walker's campaign - the 2nd top donation. And wouldn't you know it, the Koch's have requisite coal interests in Wisconsin, and would be in prime position to buy the newly-for-sale plants. But as EcoPolitology.org points out, the bigger issue undoubtedly lies in the environmental deregulation of the plants when they would hit the incommunicable sector, not the sale of the plants themselves. But the most egregious example of cronyism in Walker's funds mend Bill is that it would turn civil assistance positions such as the chief legal counsel, collective data officer and legislative liaison into appointed positions - appointed by Walker, of course. The kicker? This piece of the bill allows Walker to take off civil servants left over from previous Democratic Gov. Jim Doyle's tenure, replacing them with Walker's hand-picked men. This section of the bill is the very definition of cronyism and is something no true Wisconsinite should ever keep or abide.

So is the bill an example of cronyism? The only potential windup to come to is that it is, straight through and through. At this point, we believe the "Budget mend Bill" is so much a misnomer that it should undoubtedly just be re-named the "My Way or the Highway" bill. The more you look at it, the less the bill has to do about balancing a funds and the more it's about settling scores. Governor Walker is bringing Wisconsin back to the days of political bosses and governmental corruption that ran rampant in the early 1900's, and it's a shame more people aren't calling him out on it.

I hope you obtain new knowledge about Medicaid Eligibility Texas. Where you possibly can put to use in your evryday life. And most importantly, your reaction is Medicaid Eligibility Texas.Read more.. their explanation Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?. View Related articles related to Medicaid Eligibility Texas. I Roll below. I actually have counseled my friends to help share the Facebook Twitter Like Tweet. Can you share Madness in Madison - Is the funds heal Bill Cronyism?.


No comments:

Post a Comment